bg

Servicing vs farming vs hunting vs specifying……how does the sales organisation make the best accountability allocation across its Sales and Service teams?

Many B2B sales organisations unwittingly set up their Sales Execs for mediocre performance by expecting them, via their charter of role breadth, to cover too much.  So how does the organisation set the right breadth of accountabilities for the Sales and Service roles?  Well, like many such considerations………it depends.  There is no one universal answer, not even an industry, sector or channel specific solution.  An unclear set of accountabilities manifests in many organisations as poor customer service, lost sales opportunities and from a customer perspective, a view that your organisation can be difficult to do business with.

Firstly, be clear on how you will apply crystal clear definitions to these terms.  Click here for example generic definitions.  It is useful to think of these accountabilities on a scale. Click here for example scale.  Servicing and farming share the commonality that they both require regularly visiting existing customers.  However, there is conflict in that servicing is a back foot (reactive and responsive) accountability making programming of targeting sales visits, whereas farming is a front foot (proactive) accountability.  Hunting and specifying share the commonality that they both require finite duration but concerted visiting of prospective new customers.  However, there is often some level of conflict in being expected to be able to adequately focus on capturing brand new customers as well as maintaining and grow existing customers.

It is possible, in some uncommon environs to set the Sales Execs responsibility for all four accountabilities and expect them to be able to achieve high performance across the board – the problem is that this breadth of charter is commonly over used.  Click here to see some common groupings of these accountabilities that have been successfully employed across a range of B2B environs. 

But how do you know which is right for you?  Start by engaging a good cross section of the relevant stakeholders in your organisation to taskforce the various considerations.  Tailor your own definitions for servicing, farming, hunting and specifying.  Use models like those already referenced  above to facilitate “as is” vs “to be” workshops.

Did you enjoy this post? We’ll be discussing Value Chain Structure and Sales Strategy, and more, in our April post… stay tuned…

Visiting The Next Level’s website can help put this discussion in perspective – you can visit out Resource Centre, which is being regularly expanded, check out the Workshops and Bootcamps your company could benefit from, as well as finding out who our clients are, and what they have had to say about The Next Level.

Posted in: Blog posts
Tags:

3 Responses to “Servicing vs farming vs hunting vs specifying……how does the sales organisation make the best accountability allocation across its Sales and Service teams?”

  1. Peter Wagner says:

    Interesting perspective!! It is important for organisations to ensure they design the requisite competencies that support the achievement of Vision, Goals and supporting strategies and then align employees to what is expected of them. Not getting this part right not only leads to compentcy gaps, but can also lead to undesired behaviours that may adversely imapct the reutation of the business. As in in the above example, sending in a servicing type mindest when hunting skills are required frustrates not only the employee, but the customer as well.

  2. Hi Glenn. I am a little confused. What is the first step I should take to get sales people farming and hunting? And are you saying that it’s very hard for sales people to be both a farmer and a hunter?
    Thanks,

  3. gg says:

    Hi Michael. Thanks for your thoughts. The first step is to uniquely define the functions – farming, hunting, servicing and specifying as they relate to your organisation. Use the generic definitions supplied in the link throughs on the blog as guidelines to faciliatate the debate. Think about your tailored defintions in terms of groups of customers and prospects…..are they all in the same position on your value chain, or do they occupy a number of different positions in your value chain environment. Do your Sales Execs sell different groups of products/services to different populations of customers and/or prospects. To what degree is specialist technical knowledge required for a complex sell vs a simple sell. There are a number of considerations to take account of to determine the right bandwidth to assign your Sales Execs across the farming – hunting – servicing – specifying spectrum. These types of considerations will help you make the right bets when it comes to having separate farmers vs hunters …. or….. combining these functions into the single Sales Exec role. As a general rule of thumb , we would start from the viewpoint encouraging a combined role and arguing the case against, rather than the other way round. Next months bulletin will provide some further insights. Thanks again Michael.

Leave a Reply